London Review of Books
-22 August 09 - 10:12
I've just spent a dispiriting evening yesterday attending a party at the
Edinburgh Internationl Book Festival thrown by the 'London Review of Books', a
magazine which, in my opinion, would be better entitled, 'The Review of
London Books'. Somehow, I'd got onto their e-mailing list. Whenever I
go to these things (not often, and now, this morning, I remember just
why that is), it makes me realise just how impossible it would be for
someone like me even for a moment to break over the consciousness of
those people and their institutions. To them, my voice is no more than
that of a barking dog in a distant street.
But I'd rather be a barking dog in the street than a silent mouse in the house.
Darius Guppy
-08 August 09 - 20:11
Dear Editor,
In his introduction to Darius Guppy's article
(7/8/09), Chris Green attempts to delegitimise Guppy's stance by
inferring his disloyalty to the UK state. In a conjunction of multiple
ironies, Guppy appears now to be assuming an anti-colonial stance and
berating the destructive 'bread and circus' culture through which
capitalist imperialism continues to be instrumentalised globally -
though of course Western European systematic 'rape and pillage' long
pre-dated the dominance of secular liberalism. While one may take issue
with Guppy's naive view of the current Iranian regime and his (still)
exaggerated comparison of the UK with a police state, as well as with
his blanket condemnation of the 'Godless Enlightenment', it is
important that one does not allow such necessary 'rhetoric of
opposites' to obscure his very precise depiction of the modus operandi
and rank hypocrisies of neocolonial power. ...
(more)